What principle is highlighted by the DeShaney case about law enforcement responsibility?

The DeShaney case underscores the principle that providing safety and protection requires a special relationship between law enforcement and the individuals they serve. In this landmark case, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that the state had a constitutional duty to protect individuals only when a special relationship exists, such as when an individual is in custody or has been directly taken under the state's care.

This principle reflects the understanding that law enforcement agencies cannot be held liable for failing to protect individuals from harm when there is no established relationship or duty of care. Essentially, the decision highlights that mere knowledge of potential harm is insufficient for imposing an obligation on law enforcement; instead, a recognized bond must be present to ensure that the public receives legal protection from state actors.

This contrast with ideas of universal protection illustrates that law enforcement responsibilities are not absolute and depend heavily on the circumstances and the nature of the interaction with individuals or communities.