Vehicle Operations Practice Test

Question: 1 / 400

Which court decision distinguished between the act of pursuing and the act of blocking a suspect?

Brower v. Inyo County

Tennessee v. Garner

The correct choice accurately highlights a significant legal precedent concerning the use of force by law enforcement during pursuits. In the context of the question, the decision in Tennessee v. Garner is critical because it specifically addresses the circumstances under which police officers may use deadly force to stop a fleeing suspect.

This case set forth that the use of force must be objectively reasonable, particularly emphasizing the distinction between merely pursuing a suspect and actually blocking or preventing their escape in a manner that could involve excessive force. The ruling underscored that officers are not justified in using deadly force unless there is a threat to their safety or the safety of others, thus creating a legal framework that helps in assessing the actions of law enforcement in similar situations.

Understanding this decision is vital for grasping how legal standards apply to law enforcement's use of force, particularly when a suspect is attempting to escape. This case underscores the importance of proportionality in law enforcement responses, reflecting the ongoing efforts to balance public safety with individual rights.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

City of Pinellas Park v. Brown

DeShaney v. Winnebago County

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy